Yesterday, the United Stated Federal Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. issued a ruling that was essentially a “technical” setback for the notion that all Internet traffic should be treated equally, better known as Net Neutrality. The ruling now permits giant corporations like Verizon, NBC/Comcast, and Time Warner to charge higher fees to content providers like Netflix, Amazon and even potentially, Google. If that sounds bad for consumers, you are right. This decision was essentially caused by an earlier decision of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission to maintain a free and open “hands off” policy, and not regulate Internet traffic, considered evil by Internet purists. But the effect of this Court ruling may be greater evil, leading to the conclusion that “common carrier” regulation may be the lesser of two evils.
Read more: http://mayo615.com/2013/02/08/urban-legend-of-free-wi-fi-for-the-masses-devil-in-the-details/ This is the best technical and market analysis on Super WiFi I have seen since I […]
Could Apple, Google and Intel Save Net Neutrality? Something potentially very important may be happening for the future […]
Further evidence that Yale Law Professor Susan P. Crawford is right about a telecom monopoly in North America […]
Yale Law Professor, Susan Crawford on Why U.S. Internet Access is Slow, Costly, and Unfair If you think that the U.S. and […]
I just finished a long chat with one of my longtime Intel colleagues in Oregon. I have the […]